From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
Date: | 2010-08-14 02:28:04 |
Message-ID: | 20100814022804.GO26232@tamriel.snowman.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> My guess is our new 9.1 functionality will reduce requests for this
> features, so we can just not list it anymore. If they still ask, we can
> re-added this not-wanted item.
I'm not so sure... I expect we're going to get people complaining that
it doesn't work the way MySQL's does now instead of complaints we don't
have it. Not sure what value there is in removing it as a "feature we're
not going to implement but realize others have"?
Thanks,
Stephen
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 02:53:57 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 02:25:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Itagaki Takahiro | 2010-08-14 02:36:11 | Re: BUG #5608: array_agg() consumes too much memory |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-08-14 02:25:45 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys. |