Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)postgresql(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.
Date: 2010-08-14 02:28:04
Message-ID: 20100814022804.GO26232@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Bruce,

* Bruce Momjian (bruce(at)momjian(dot)us) wrote:
> My guess is our new 9.1 functionality will reduce requests for this
> features, so we can just not list it anymore. If they still ask, we can
> re-added this not-wanted item.

I'm not so sure... I expect we're going to get people complaining that
it doesn't work the way MySQL's does now instead of complaints we don't
have it. Not sure what value there is in removing it as a "feature we're
not going to implement but realize others have"?

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-14 02:53:57 Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-14 02:25:45 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Itagaki Takahiro 2010-08-14 02:36:11 Re: BUG #5608: array_agg() consumes too much memory
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-08-14 02:25:45 Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Recognize functional dependency on primary keys.