Re: Is there a way to bypass sql?

From: Adrian von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Is there a way to bypass sql?
Date: 2010-08-11 20:02:45
Message-ID: 201008112202.46277@fortytwo.ch
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Wednesday 11 August 2010 07.31:24 Samantha Atkins wrote:
> There is also the interesting case of dynamic OO languages where
> technically the object fields do not have a defined type to start
> with.

I'm not sure what you want to say here. If you apply this to databases, my
answer is: if you want to use persistent objects in such languages, don't
use a relational database, since it's just the wrong tool. Storing stuff
like XML snippets or Python pickled objects or whatever in tables in a
postgres database is just like using a 40t lorry to commute to work: it's
possible, but it's kind of silly.

cheers
-- vbi

--
Protect your privacy - encrypt your email: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-08-11 20:12:20 Re: 8 trigger record(s) not found for relation managements
Previous Message rh 2010-08-11 19:24:33 8 trigger record(s) not found for relation managements