From: | Adrian von Bidder <avbidder(at)fortytwo(dot)ch> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Is there a way to bypass sql? |
Date: | 2010-08-11 20:02:45 |
Message-ID: | 201008112202.46277@fortytwo.ch |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wednesday 11 August 2010 07.31:24 Samantha Atkins wrote:
> There is also the interesting case of dynamic OO languages where
> technically the object fields do not have a defined type to start
> with.
I'm not sure what you want to say here. If you apply this to databases, my
answer is: if you want to use persistent objects in such languages, don't
use a relational database, since it's just the wrong tool. Storing stuff
like XML snippets or Python pickled objects or whatever in tables in a
postgres database is just like using a 40t lorry to commute to work: it's
possible, but it's kind of silly.
cheers
-- vbi
--
Protect your privacy - encrypt your email: http://fortytwo.ch/gpg/intro
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-08-11 20:12:20 | Re: 8 trigger record(s) not found for relation managements |
Previous Message | rh | 2010-08-11 19:24:33 | 8 trigger record(s) not found for relation managements |