Re: Question about Idle in TX

From: David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Question about Idle in TX
Date: 2010-08-03 19:52:57
Message-ID: 20100803195257.GC53503@mr-paradox.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 03:49:57PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
- David Kerr <dmk(at)mr-paradox(dot)net> writes:
- > for example: If a java program connects to the DB and does "begin;"
- > and then internally does a "sleep 6 days"
-
- > Does that cauz any issues other than eating a connection to the database?
-
- In recent versions of PG, no. Before about 8.3 it was a Really Bad Idea,
- because the open transaction would prevent VACUUM from reclaiming storage.
-
- It's *still* a Really Bad Idea to begin a transaction, do something,
- and then sleep 6 days. But "BEGIN" without any following commands
- has been fixed to be harmless, mainly because there are so many
- badly designed clients that do exactly that ...
-
- regards, tom lane
-

ah ok, I think i'm in that group. We're using Talend and i think it might be
doing that, and it might be a bit of an effort to stop that from happening.

We're on 8.3.9, so hopefully it's fairly safe then?

Thanks

Dave

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-08-03 19:57:27 Re: Question about Idle in TX
Previous Message George Silva 2010-08-03 19:50:44 Re: Finding the primary key of tables