From: | "Peter C(dot) Lai" <peter(at)simons-rock(dot)edu> |
---|---|
To: | Armand Turpel <armand(dot)turpel(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: varchar[] or text[] |
Date: | 2010-07-22 18:18:18 |
Message-ID: | 20100722181817.GS35187@cesium.hyperfine.info |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
This was discussed yesterday and previously. Please read the archives.
There is no positive performance reason to use varchar instead of text.
On 2010-07-22 05:38:14PM +0200, Armand Turpel wrote:
> Hi,
> I know this issue was controversed discussed. Some one see no really
> benefits of using varchar against text var. But i'm asking me what if i
> use it as array values. Is there any difference between varchar[126],
> varchar[10000] and text[] else than the number of chars i can store in?
> Performance, memory usage, ....?
>
> --
> Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org)
> To make changes to your subscription:
> http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
--
===========================================================
Peter C. Lai | Bard College at Simon's Rock
Systems Administrator | 84 Alford Rd.
Information Technology Svcs. | Gt. Barrington, MA 01230 USA
peter AT simons-rock.edu | (413) 528-7428
===========================================================
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oliver Kohll - Mailing Lists | 2010-07-22 18:25:43 | Re: locating cities within a radius of another |
Previous Message | Andreas Joseph Krogh | 2010-07-22 17:56:24 | Re: Clarification of the "simple" dictionary |