From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | "Hans van Kranenburg" <hans(dot)van(dot)kranenburg(at)mendix(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] BUG #5566: High levels of savepoint nesting trigger stack overflow in AssignTransactionId |
Date: | 2010-07-19 17:50:12 |
Message-ID: | 201007191950.13856.andres@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Monday 19 July 2010 17:58:06 Andres Freund wrote:
> On Monday 19 July 2010 17:26:25 Hans van Kranenburg wrote:
> > When issuing an update statement in a transaction with ~30800 levels of
> > savepoint nesting, (which is insane, but possible), postgresql segfaults
> > due to a stack overflow in the AssignTransactionId function, which
> > recursively assign transaction ids to parent transactions.
>
> It seems easy enough to throw a check_stack_depth() in there - survives
> make check here.
>
> It would be nice to check this earlier on though - or simply impose a
> artificial limit of nested transactions. I severely doubt that there are
> non- bug situations with a nesting of above 1k (so maybe set the limit to
> 3k).
>
> Thats independent from checking stack depth there though - it sounds
> possible to get there after an already relatively deep stack usage (deeply
> nested functions or such).
A patch doing both is attached. No idea whether 3k is a good limit.
A small testprogramm is also attached.
Andres
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Don-t-segfault-upon-too-deeply-nested-subtransaction.patch | text/x-patch | 2.4 KB |
test.py | text/x-python | 387 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-07-19 17:57:13 | Re: BUG #5566: High levels of savepoint nesting trigger stack overflow in AssignTransactionId |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2010-07-19 15:58:06 | Re: BUG #5566: High levels of savepoint nesting trigger stack overflow in AssignTransactionId |