Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache

From: Josip Rodin <joy(at)entuzijast(dot)net>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache
Date: 2010-07-12 07:41:18
Message-ID: 20100712074118.GA30625@orion.carnet.hr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 02:06:43PM +0800, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Meh, personally I'll stick to the good old profiling methods "is it fast
> enough", "\timing", and "explain analyze".

I agree. Some hint could be included in 'explain analyze' output, maybe just
to separate the timings for things that are well covered by the query plan
optimizer from those that aren't. I found this in a line like this:

Filter: (approved AND (NOT archived) AND ((time_to > now()) OR (time_to IS NULL)) AND ((time_from < now()) OR (time_from IS NULL)) AND usercandoonobject(1, 1, 'news'::bpchar, news_id))

These other referenced columns in the filter were all insignificant
(time-wise) compared to the single function call, but I had to find
that out with a manual search.

--
2. That which causes joy or happiness.

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jayadevan M 2010-07-12 08:29:36 Re: Queries about PostgreSQL PITR
Previous Message Dave Page 2010-07-12 07:38:49 Re: simple functions, huge overhead, no cache