From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Chris <rfusca(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 |
Date: | 2010-06-25 21:44:46 |
Message-ID: | 201006252344.47407.andres@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wednesday 23 June 2010 16:30:54 Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > I can reproduce this, here. The problem seems to be that plpython
> > only build either plpython2.so or plython3.so, but both languages
> > expect a call handler called plython_call_handler. So once we load
> > the shared library for one language, the other language just grabs the
> > same call handler.
>
> We had better fix that --- I can definitely foresee installations
> wanting to use both plpython2 and plpython3. This'd require a change in
> the default contents of pg_pltemplate, though. Does it seem important
> enough to bump catversion for?
Has anybody actually researched if it is safe to run python2 and python3 in
the same address space? I wouldnt be surprised at all if that where
problematic.
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2010-06-25 22:57:54 | Re: testing plpython3u on 9.0beta2 |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-06-25 21:09:29 | Re: Admission Control |