From: | Ivan Sergio Borgonovo <mail(at)webthatworks(dot)it> |
---|---|
To: | <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Need Some Recent Information on the Differences between Postgres and MySql |
Date: | 2010-06-25 19:34:22 |
Message-ID: | 20100625213422.6fab2014@dawn.webthatworks.it |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Fri, 25 Jun 2010 08:48:11 -0700
Rob Wultsch <wultsch(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> The freedom of the storage engine interface allows for much more
> varied backend characteristics. Some examples:
This is *really* fascinating but pg transactional engine is very
mature and solid.
Before any of the should-be-really-transactional-engine of MySQL
will be as mature as pg's one, pg will have a lot more
feature/speed/development sugar.
If I didn't need a transactional engine I'd be happy to go (well not
really happy[1]) with MySQL and any of its engines.
It is nice to reuse and mix and match different tools.
[1] I find some inconsistency of mysql a bit painful to live with...
as I find some inconsistency in PHP equally irritating but they are
there, quite diffused and still for certain domains the best
compromise available.
--
Ivan Sergio Borgonovo
http://www.webthatworks.it
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | MOLINA BRAVO FELIPE DE JESUS | 2010-06-25 21:21:23 | pl-perl for 64 bits in Solaris 9 |
Previous Message | LLC Chief Financial Officer | 2010-06-25 18:45:55 | Need help on extracting composite array element in āCā |