From: | "Jean-Yves F(dot) Barbier" <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: (not so?) silly question |
Date: | 2010-06-15 13:57:15 |
Message-ID: | 20100615155715.08827916@anubis.defcon1 |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-novice |
Le Tue, 15 Jun 2010 06:55:45 +0200,
Andreas Kretschmer <akretschmer(at)spamfence(dot)net> a écrit :
> Jean-Yves F. Barbier <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > Is it safe to leave an internet access to SSL Pg (4096 bits key) or not?
>
> Do you need inernet access?
Of course I need one, otherwise I wouldn't ask.
My goal is also to use the Pg server part using a client only instead of
using a client-server, witch seems logical (well, for me: why reinvent
the wheel?). <- is this realistic?
But may be I should use a double security and use a tunnel or a VPN
connection on top of this (but it will bring its part of bytes overhead.)
--
Never eat anything bigger than your head.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Campbell | 2010-06-15 15:25:34 | Mixed case text searches |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-06-15 13:47:24 | Re: Using libpq from within postgresql |