| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Amiel <jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Restore roles with same oid |
| Date: | 2010-06-08 15:39:37 |
| Message-ID: | 20100608153937.GP21875@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
* Jeff Amiel (jamiel(at)istreamimaging(dot)com) wrote:
> On 6/8/10 10:30 AM, "Thom Brown" <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Can't you switch to using role names? I don't think oids are intended
> > to be used by anything other than PostgreSQL.
>
> :( If only I could....massive audit tables contain these IDs with years of
> data....
>
> We have a plan to change to sequence values stored in one of our tables (one
> for each of our postgresql users) but don't want to pull the trigger on that
> plan as part of this upgrade if we can help it.
I'm afriad you're not going to have a choice.. I would recommend
creating a mapping from the old IDs to the new ones as part of this
upgrade, to keep the historical information. Guess it's not nice to
point this out- but you really shouldn't have ever used OIDs for
something external to PG (or even internally, really). :)
Thanks!
Stephen
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Amiel | 2010-06-08 15:42:39 | Re: Restore roles with same oid |
| Previous Message | Justin Graf | 2010-06-08 15:36:40 | Re: Cognitive dissonance |