Re: why do we have rd_istemp?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: why do we have rd_istemp?
Date: 2010-05-31 20:03:57
Message-ID: 201005312003.o4VK3vq16767@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > Given "Relation rel", it looks to me like rel->rd_rel->relistemp will
> > always give the same answer as rel->rd_istemp. So why have both?
>
> Might be historical --- relistemp is pretty new.

Is this a TODO or something we want to clean up?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ None of us is going to be here forever. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-05-31 20:09:24 Re: bitmap-index-scan faster than seq-scan on full-table-scan (gin index)
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-05-31 20:02:51 Re: improve plpgsql's EXECUTE 'select into' message with a hint