From: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp |
Cc: | ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp, ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: exporting raw parser |
Date: | 2010-05-27 03:01:56 |
Message-ID: | 20100527.120156.55840891.t-ishii@sraoss.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> My "stand-alone" means libSQL can be used from many modules
> without duplicated codes. For example, copy routines for raw
> parse trees should be in the DLL rather than in postgres.exe.
>
> Then, we need to consider other products than pgpool. Who will
> use the dll? If pgpool is the only user, we might not allow to
> modify core codes only for one usecase. More research other than
> pgpool is required to decide the interface routines for libSQL.
If the user of the new API is only pgpool-II, I hadn't made the
propose in the first place. It's a waste of time and I would rather
keep on borrowing the parse code. I thought there were several people
who needed the API as well in the cluster meeting. If somebody who
made such a vote in the meeting is on the list, please express your
opinion for the API.
I'm not in the position of speaking for other products.
--
Tatsuo Ishii
SRA OSS, Inc. Japan
English: http://www.sraoss.co.jp/index_en.php
Japanese: http://www.sraoss.co.jp
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2010-05-27 03:07:58 | pg_trgm |
Previous Message | KaiGai Kohei | 2010-05-27 03:00:56 | Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook |