From: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
---|---|
To: | Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Open Item: pg_controldata - machine readable? |
Date: | 2010-05-26 03:32:49 |
Message-ID: | 20100526123249.B287.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> wrote:
> >> There is an open item "pg_controldata - machine readable?" in the list:
> >> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/PostgreSQL_9.0_Open_Items
> >> Should we add the module to 9.0?
> >
> > No. This is a new feature that wasn't even under consideration,
> > let alone written, at the time of 9.0 feature freeze. It does not
> > get into either core or contrib this time around.
>
> Yup, agreed. That was why I put it on github instead of sending a patch
> to the list. It was also a quick and dirty hack -- maybe it could be
> cleaned up for 9.1, but I'm not sure there was consensus that it was
> really needed.
OK, I moved it from 9.0 open items to new features for 9.1.
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-05-26 03:36:04 | Re: Synchronization levels in SR |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-26 03:19:13 | Re: Open Item: invalid declspec for PG_MODULE_MAGIC |