Re: Regression testing for psql

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Regression testing for psql
Date: 2010-05-25 10:23:53
Message-ID: 20100525102353.GM21875@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* Robert Haas (robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
> > Of course, if people want to suggest tests that just shouldn't be
> > included, I can go through and strip things out.
>
> Well... I'm a little reluctant to believe that we should have 3.3M of
> tests for the entire backend and 5M of tests just for psql. Then,
> too, there's the fact that many of these tests fail on my machine
> because my username is not sfrost, and/or because of row-ordering
> differences on backslash commands without enough ORDER BY to fully
> determine the output order.

Yeah, you know, I had fully intended to go grepping through the output
last night to check for things like that, but my wife decided I needed
sleep instead. :) Sorry about that. Still, it's more of a general
proposal than something I think should be committed as-is. Should we
try to deal with those kinds of differences, or just eliminate the tests
which are dependent on username, etc? It definitely strikes me that
there's a fair bit of code in psql we're not exercising in some fashion
in the regression suite... :/

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Stephen Frost 2010-05-25 10:28:49 Re: ExecutorCheckPerms() hook
Previous Message Fujii Masao 2010-05-25 10:19:39 Re: Stefan's bug (was: max_standby_delay considered harmful)