Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h
Date: 2010-05-24 16:15:26
Message-ID: 20100524161526.GB15029@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 11:50:00AM -0400, Stephen Frost wrote:
> > If we need this we should do it properly with autoconf.

I absolutely agree and planed to do that *after* the release if it makes sense
for the rest of PG, but wouldn't want to mess with it in the current
situtation. On the other hand I didn't want to release with that bug in there.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2010-05-24 16:18:43 Re: Synchronization levels in SR
Previous Message Michael Meskes 2010-05-24 16:13:55 Re: [PATCH] Move 'long long' check to c.h