Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Date: 2010-05-21 17:45:45
Message-ID: 20100521174545.GV21875@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* David Fetter (david(at)fetter(dot)org) wrote:
> That is *precisely* the business we need to be in, at least for the
> languages we ship, and it would behoove us to test languages we don't
> ship so we can warn people when they don't pass.

k, let's start with something simpler first tho- I'm sure we can pull in
the glibc regression tests and run them too. You know, just in case
there's a bug there, somewhere.

Thanks,

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-05-21 17:58:18 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Previous Message David Fetter 2010-05-21 17:39:09 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?