Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?

From: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Date: 2010-05-21 16:26:24
Message-ID: 20100521162624.GU21875@tamriel.snowman.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

* David Fetter (david(at)fetter(dot)org) wrote:
> These need to be testable conditions, and new tests need to get added
> any time we find that we've missed something. Making this concept
> fuzzier is exactly the wrong direction to go.

I'm really not sure that we want to be in the business of writing a ton
of regression tests to see if languages which claim to be trusted really
are..

Stephen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Fetter 2010-05-21 17:39:09 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2010-05-21 16:25:52 Re: Specification for Trusted PLs?