* Keaton_Adams(at)McAfee(dot)com (Keaton_Adams(at)McAfee(dot)com) wrote:
> It looks like it is just a difference in data volume. We are re-working the query to see what that will do.
Just my 2c, but I'd recommend using JOIN syntax instead of comma-joins.
eg:
select * from a JOIN b USING (col1,col2);
or:
select * from a JOIN b ON (a.col1 = b.col2);
Would make the query alot easier to read, imv. Also, those UNION ALLs
probably aren't really helping this whole situation.. Perhaps you could
move them out of the FROM clause and just have a simpler query for each
set which is *then* UNION ALL'd together.
THanks,
Stephen
Thanks,
Stephen