| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Brian Modra <epailty(at)googlemail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PGSQL Mailing List <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Clustering, parallelised operating system, super-computing |
| Date: | 2010-05-14 00:21:30 |
| Message-ID: | 201005140021.o4E0LUl14844@momjian.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Brian Modra wrote:
> Hi,
> I've been told that PostgreSQL and other similar databases don't work
> well on a parallelised operating system because they make good use of
> shared memory which does not cross the boundary between nodes in a
> cluster.
>
> So I am wondering if any work is being done to make it possible to
> have a single database schema that spans a number of hosts?
>
> For example, a table on one host/node that has a reference to a table
> on another host/node with deletes cascading back.
> e.g.
Not currently. There are some prototypes in development, but those
usually have the same database on all the machines and they share the
load.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh.Vote | 2010-05-14 01:57:24 | Re: Unpivot / uncrosstab support? |
| Previous Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-05-14 00:16:18 | Re: pg_dumpall for Postgres Database Daily Backup |