From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Gauthier, Dave" <dave(dot)gauthier(at)intel(dot)com>, "pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Pulling data from a constraint def |
Date: | 2010-05-14 00:14:36 |
Message-ID: | 20100514001436.GE3460@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 08:08:31PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> > On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 12:33:08AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> >> I'm surprised no one has yet suggested an ENUM type.
>
> > I didn't suggest it because I didn't know about it, but because
> > I've found ENUM to be a trap for the unwary.
>
> > Very seldom are people absolutely certain that they'll have one
> > particular list of things forever. The list may grow or shrink,
> > or the order may change, and in those cases where the list changes
> > somehow, ENUM causes more problems than it solves.
>
> Well, the inability to change the list of values is certainly an
> unpleasant limitation, but is it so fatal that we should hide the
> feature from people who could possibly use it? I think not.
It's enough of a foot-gun that I would not even mention it to start
with, except to discuss its problems.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Scott Marlowe | 2010-05-14 00:16:18 | Re: pg_dumpall for Postgres Database Daily Backup |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-05-14 00:08:31 | Re: Pulling data from a constraint def |