| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Date: | 2010-05-10 14:57:11 |
| Message-ID: | 201005101457.o4AEvBm24537@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Simon Riggs wrote:
> Bruce has used the word crippleware for the current state. Raising a
> problem and then blocking solutions is the best way I know to cripple a
> release. It should be clear that I've done my best to avoid this
FYI, it was Robert Haas who used the term "crippleware" to describe a
boolean value for max_standby_delay, and I was just repeating his term,
and disputing it would be crippleware.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-05-10 15:07:35 | Re: max_standby_delay considered harmful |
| Previous Message | Michael Tharp | 2010-05-10 14:48:01 | Re: no universally correct setting for fsync |