From: | Adrian Klaver <adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Anthony <osm(at)inbox(dot)org>, Cédric Villemain <cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rod <cckramer(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Storing many big files in database- should I do it? |
Date: | 2010-04-28 02:32:38 |
Message-ID: | 201004271932.38494.adrian.klaver@gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Tuesday 27 April 2010 5:45:43 pm Anthony wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 5:17 AM, Cédric Villemain <
>
> cedric(dot)villemain(dot)debian(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > store your files in a filesystem, and keep the path to the file (plus
> > metadata, acl, etc...) in database.
>
> What type of filesystem is good for this? A filesystem with support for
> storing tens of thousands of files in a single directory, or should one
> play the 41/56/34/41563489.ext game?
>
> Are there any open source systems which handle keeping a filesystem and
> database in sync for this purpose, or is it a wheel that keeps getting
> reinvented?
>
> I know "store your files in a filesystem" is the best long-term solution.
> But it's just so much easier to just throw everything in the database.
In the for what it is worth department check out this Wiki:
http://sourceforge.net/apps/mediawiki/fuse/index.php?title=DatabaseFileSystems
--
Adrian Klaver
adrian(dot)klaver(at)gmail(dot)com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Chris Velevitch | 2010-04-28 03:10:38 | Is the wiki down? |
Previous Message | Bryan Murphy | 2010-04-28 01:33:09 | Re: Postgresql on EC2/EBS in production? |