| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Differential backup | 
| Date: | 2010-04-27 13:50:44 | 
| Message-ID: | 20100427135043.GA5237@alvh.no-ip.org | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
Simon Riggs wrote:
> 
> Thinking about allowing a backup to tell which files have changed in the
> database since last backup. This would allow an external utility to copy
> away only changed files.
> 
> Now there's a few ways of doing this and many will say this is already
> possible using file access times.
> 
> An explicit mechanism where Postgres could authoritatively say which
> files have changed would make many feel safer, especially when other
> databases also do this.
> 
> We keep track of which files require fsync(), so we could also keep
> track of changed files using that same information.
Why file level?  Seems a bit too coarse (particularly if you have large
file support enabled).  Maybe we could keep block-level last change info
in a separate fork.
-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-27 13:51:36 | Re: Wierd quirk of HS/SR, probably not fixable | 
| Previous Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-04-27 13:30:14 | Differential backup |