From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |
Date: | 2010-04-22 21:14:00 |
Message-ID: | 20100422211400.GD3244@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane escribió:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> > On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 7:13 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> >> (You might want to look back at the archived discussions about how to
> >> avoid storing entries for temp tables in these catalogs; that poses
> >> many of the same issues.)
>
> > Do you happen to know what a good search term might be? I tried
> > searching for things like "pg_class temp tables" and "pg_class
> > temporary tables" and didn't come up with much.
>
> I found this thread:
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2008-07/msg00593.php
> I claimed in that message that there were previous discussions but
> I did not come across them right away.
I vaguely remember that there was a discussion about pg_attribute and
the extra rows for system rows for all tables, which diverged into a
discussion about temp tables and those other extra rows.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-04-22 21:41:29 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |
Previous Message | Erik Rijkers | 2010-04-22 18:39:14 | Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance |