| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Joshua Tolley <eggyknap(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |
| Date: | 2010-04-20 22:48:17 |
| Message-ID: | 20100420224817.GE3229@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas escribió:
> I suppose the problem here is that pg_attribute and pg_class are not
> shared catalogs, so we can't read them without selecting a database.
> What about making a fake version of these relations that includes only
> the shared catalogs?
Hmm, interesting. I wonder if something of this sort would allow one to
create a shared relation at the user level -- right now the set of
shared relations is hardcoded so this cannot work.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-04-20 22:51:48 | Re: Vacuum cancels autovacuum error message confusing? |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-04-20 22:12:36 | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |