Re: When is an explicit cast necessary?

From: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
To: Alan Millington <admillington(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: When is an explicit cast necessary?
Date: 2010-04-15 14:17:35
Message-ID: 20100415141735.GA7259@alvh.no-ip.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Alan Millington wrote:

> If you think that smallints are more bother than they are worth, perhaps you should remove support for smallints completely. Then people would know where they stood. (Or you could make smallint a synonym for int.)

smallint can be used usefully -- you just need to know how and when.

--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lewis Kapell 2010-04-15 14:37:27 Re: Query is stuck
Previous Message Jan Krcmar 2010-04-15 13:56:20 Re: VACUUM process running for a long time