From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Alan Millington <admillington(at)yahoo(dot)co(dot)uk> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog(at)svana(dot)org>, Alban Hertroys <dalroi(at)solfertje(dot)student(dot)utwente(dot)nl>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Postgres general mailing list <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: When is an explicit cast necessary? |
Date: | 2010-04-15 14:17:35 |
Message-ID: | 20100415141735.GA7259@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alan Millington wrote:
> If you think that smallints are more bother than they are worth, perhaps you should remove support for smallints completely. Then people would know where they stood. (Or you could make smallint a synonym for int.)
smallint can be used usefully -- you just need to know how and when.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lewis Kapell | 2010-04-15 14:37:27 | Re: Query is stuck |
Previous Message | Jan Krcmar | 2010-04-15 13:56:20 | Re: VACUUM process running for a long time |