From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, Scott Marlowe <scott(dot)marlowe(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Rogue TODO list created |
Date: | 2010-04-15 01:40:17 |
Message-ID: | 201004150140.o3F1eHC23884@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Greg Smith wrote:
> Josh Kupershmidt wrote:
> > FWIW, I'm not religious about psql's formatting; I'd be happy with
> > this information being displayed only for \d+, in whatever form makes
> > folks happy.
> >
> > I unfortunately don't have much time to try a patch myself at the moment :(
> >
>
> It's a straightforward patch to write with clear value, which we can
> always use more of. I added it to
> http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Prioritised_Todo#psql so people looking
> for an easy patch to chew on one day can find it.
[ Thread moved to hackers.]
What is "Prioritised" Todo? It looks like a copy of the TODO list that
was created on March 23, 2010, and only you and Simon have modified it:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/index.php?title=Prioritised_Todo&action=history
Of course it is not getting updates that are added to the main TODO
list. What can this cause except confusion! I am hoping to hear a
reasonable explanation why this was done, and why changes are going
there instead of the main TODO list, which is here:
http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Todo
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | raghavendra t | 2010-04-15 01:50:21 | Re: VACUUM process running for a long time |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-15 00:07:27 | Re: Removing files under pg_clog |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-15 01:48:17 | Re: Win32 timezone matching |
Previous Message | daveg | 2010-04-15 00:54:47 | Re: a faster compression algorithm for pg_dump |