Re: confusing archive_command example

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Josh Kupershmidt <schmiddy(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: confusing archive_command example
Date: 2010-03-31 23:51:14
Message-ID: 201003312351.o2VNpFd25456@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-docs

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > What about:
> > archive_command = 'test ! -f ...%f &amp;&amp; cp %p ...%f'
>
> Perhaps, though I still think this isn't an improvement over the
> original.

His complaint was that .../%f looks like ../%f; is that a valid
concern? I have reverted the change. Also, should we be using test !
-e instead of -f?

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-docs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-04-01 00:03:03 Re: confusing archive_command example
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-03-31 23:46:49 Re: confusing archive_command example