From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
Subject: | Order of pg_stat_activity timestamp columns |
Date: | 2010-03-17 20:42:26 |
Message-ID: | 201003172042.o2HKgQv23693@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Has anyone ever noticed that the order of pg_stat_activity timestamp
columns is illogical:
xact_start | timestamp with time zone |
query_start | timestamp with time zone |
backend_start | timestamp with time zone |
query_start is always between the other two timestamps. Moving
query_start before xact_start would make the most sense. I wouldn't
bring this up except we just added application_name before these
columns, so we are already going to have different column locations for
these fields in 9.0.
Should we move query_start?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2010-03-17 20:44:05 | Re: An idle thought |
Previous Message | Josh Berkus | 2010-03-17 17:06:44 | Re: Getting to beta1 |