Re: Partitioning syntax

From: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
To: Dmitry Fefelov <fozzy(at)ac-sw(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: Partitioning syntax
Date: 2010-03-17 13:52:15
Message-ID: 20100317135215.GA2577@fetter.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 01:55:45PM +0600, Dmitry Fefelov wrote:
> > Here is a revised partitioning syntax patch. It implements only syntax and
> > on-disk structure mentioned below:
> > Table Partitioning#Syntax
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#Syntax
> > Table Partitioning#On-disk structure
> > http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Table_partitioning#On-disk_structure
>
> Will 9.1 partitions allow to reference partitioned tables in foreign keys?

For now, you can do something like this:

http://people.planetpostgresql.org/dfetter/index.php?/archives/51-Partitioning-Is-Such-Sweet-Sorrow.html

Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics

Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-03-17 15:46:05 Re: PQftype implementation
Previous Message Florian Pflug 2010-03-17 13:12:02 Re: Dyamic updates of NEW with pl/pgsql