| From: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Piyush Newe <piyush(dot)newe(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Repetition of warning message while REVOKE |
| Date: | 2010-03-05 13:18:33 |
| Message-ID: | 20100305131833.GT17756@tamriel.snowman.net |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
* Tom Lane (tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us) wrote:
> One thought is that the column cases should be phrased more like
> no privileges could be revoked for column "foo" of table "bar"
> Check the messages associated with DROP cascading for the canonical
> phrasing here, but I think that's what it is.
Looks like 'for column "foo" of relation "bar"' is more typical, so
that's what I did in the attached patch. I also cleaned up a few other
things I noticed in looking through the various messages/comments.
Thanks!
Stephen
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| fixdups_20100305.patch | text/x-diff | 4.4 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Smith | 2010-03-05 13:31:14 | Re: machine-readable pg_controldata? |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-03-05 10:30:22 | Re: Explicit psqlrc |