From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ECPG, two varchars with same name on same line |
Date: | 2010-02-27 03:23:19 |
Message-ID: | 201002270323.o1R3NJs24865@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Michael Meskes wrote:
> On Fri, May 01, 2009 at 03:49:47PM +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> > ECPG constructs internal struct names for VARCHAR fields using the field
> > name and line number it's defined on. In a contrived example, though,
> > that's not unique. Consider the following example:
> > ...
> > That hardly happens in practice, of course, but it's trivial to fix by
> > just adding some more salt to the struct name, like a simple counter, so
> > it seems we should.
>
> In principle you're right. However, the change needs to be added in several
> places like the internal variable structure that keeps the lineno anyway but
> needs to add the counter too. BTW we can remove the lineno then I think.
> Anyway, given that we are close to a release and the bug apparently never got
> up in a real life usage for years I'd prefer to not change it now but wait
> until the release has been done.
Was this fixed?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-27 03:27:16 | Re: plpgsql: numeric assignment to an integer variable errors out |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-27 03:18:25 | Re: Testing of parallel restore with current snapshot |