Re: Why isn't stats_temp_directory automatically created?

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why isn't stats_temp_directory automatically created?
Date: 2010-02-26 03:06:37
Message-ID: 201002260306.o1Q36bx09498@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > I assume we decided we didn't want this.
>
> I thought the risk/reward ratio was pretty bad.

Yea, the symlink issue killed it for me.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-02-26 03:10:56 Re: A thought: should we run pgindent now?
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-02-26 03:06:06 Re: Why isn't stats_temp_directory automatically created?