| From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: function side effects |
| Date: | 2010-02-23 14:44:48 |
| Message-ID: | 20100223144448.GB3672@alvh.no-ip.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tatsuo Ishii wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if we could detect a funcion has a side effect,
> i.e. does a write to database. This is neccessary for pgpool to decide
> if a qeury should to be sent to all of databases or not. If a query
> includes functions which do writes to database, it should send the
> query to all of databases, otherwise the contents of databases go into
> inconsistent state.
I was talking about this to someone in Cuba and one conclusion we
reached was that this was a fairly difficult task -- consider that
someone may choose to define an innocent-looking operator using a
volatile function. If you only examine things that look like functions
in the query you will miss those. The only way to figure out whether a
query has a write effect is to ask the server about the whole query.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Greg Stark | 2010-02-23 14:46:40 | Assertion failure in walreceiver |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-23 14:34:26 | Re: Issues for named/mixed function notation patch |