Re: Wire protocol docs

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Wire protocol docs
Date: 2010-02-22 18:12:13
Message-ID: 201002221812.o1MICDX12295@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 6:24 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> writes:
> >> Right. My complaint though, is that the docs imply that the info on
> >> how those values get set is in the docs somewhere, which appears to be
> >> incorrect.
> >
> > The libpq documentation does cover the fact that libpq uses those
> > variables to establish initial settings. ?I wouldn't expect it to
> > go into implementation details, would you?
>
> Not the libpq docs, no. I was expecting something to though, having
> been told in the intro to the low level protocol details that:
>
> "Higher level features built on this protocol (for example, how libpq
> passes certain environment variables when the connection is
> established) are covered elsewhere."
>
> Note that it says *how* libpq passes those variables which implies the
> mechanism of passing them to the server. Anyway, I can figure out what
> I need from the existing code - I just found that sentence misleading
> and think it should probably be removed.

Agreed, removed.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
PG East: http://www.enterprisedb.com/community/nav-pg-east-2010.do
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2010-02-22 18:13:21 Re: What does this configure warning mean?
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2010-02-22 18:08:49 Re: transaction_isolation vs. default_transaction_isolation