From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
Date: | 2010-02-19 18:40:06 |
Message-ID: | 20100219184006.GE27534@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 01:34:46PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:38 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> > Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> writes:
> >> David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> >>> support both pre-9.0 and post-9.0 PostgreSQLs. David Wheeler has
> >>> suggested that we special-case PL/pgsql for 9.0 and greater, as it's
> >>> in template0, where those tests are based.
> >
> >> +1 for the CREATE LANGUAGE IF NOT EXISTS behavior.
> >
> >> The regression test in the core is targeting only its version,
> >> but some external projects have version-independent tests.
> >
> > I think it's more like "are under the fond illusion that their
> > tests are version-independent". Are we going to back out the next
> > incompatible change we choose to make as soon as somebody notices
> > that it breaks a third-party test case? I don't think so. Let me
> > point out that choosing to install plpgsql by default has already
> > broken "--single" restore of practically every pg_dump out there.
> > Nobody batted an eye about that. Why are we suddenly so
> > concerned about its effects on unnamed test suites?
>
> I am still of the opinion that changing this was a bad idea for
> exactly this reason. We could perhaps ameliorate this problem by
> implementing CREATE OR REPLACE for languages and emitting that
> instead; then the command in the dump would be a noop.
CREATE OR REPLACE LANGUAGE is an even bigger tar pit.
For example:
http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2009-10/msg00386.php
Please find attached a patch which does this check in pg_regress.
Cheers,
David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
ignore_plpgsql.diff | text/plain | 659 bytes |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2010-02-19 18:41:16 | Re: ALTER ROLE/DATABASE RESET ALL versus security |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-02-19 18:34:46 | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |