From: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Euler Taveira de Oliveira <euler(at)timbira(dot)com> |
Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: PGXS: REGRESS_OPTS=--load-language=plpgsql |
Date: | 2010-02-19 02:40:30 |
Message-ID: | 20100219024030.GA27534@fetter.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Feb 19, 2010 at 12:26:29AM -0200, Euler Taveira de Oliveira wrote:
> David Fetter escreveu:
> > OK, I know it's late, but having PL/pgsql on by default has caused
> > an unforeseen need: --require-language.
> >
> Why? IMHO pg_regress should be used with the same postgres version
> it was built with. So any tests that use --load-language=plpgsql
> should be fixed. Besides we could patch pg_regress.c to ignore
> loading plpgsql language into the database (instead of adding
> another parameter -- we already have too many options).
Any external projects will fail on this if they're attempting to
support both pre-9.0 and post-9.0 PostgreSQLs. David Wheeler has
suggested that we special-case PL/pgsql for 9.0 and greater, as it's
in template0, where those tests are based.
Cheers,
Another David.
--
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> http://fetter.org/
Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter
Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david(dot)fetter(at)gmail(dot)com
iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics
Remember to vote!
Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-19 03:34:37 | Re: LATERAL |
Previous Message | David Christensen | 2010-02-19 02:31:05 | Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans. |