Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG

From: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
To: Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: NaN/Inf fix for ECPG
Date: 2010-02-17 07:50:48
Message-ID: 20100217075048.GA27968@feivel.credativ.lan
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 10:28:00PM +0100, Michael Meskes wrote:
> I was trying to stress the *beta* status. Maybe someone into NetBSD might be
> interested in reporting this as a bug. At least it behaves different to all
> other archs we have.

Hmm, it seems the patch didn't work. Back to the drawing board.

Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Takahiro Itagaki 2010-02-17 08:18:24 Re: [GENERAL] possible bug with inheritance?
Previous Message Jakub Ouhrabka 2010-02-17 07:42:05 Re: Problem with 8.4 stats collector high load