Re: log_error_verbosity function display

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> > Jaime Casanova wrote:
> >> i like this with or without the (), but maybe we are breaking client
> >> apps if change that
>
> > Ah, so you like FUNCTION.
>
> You can NOT change the line tag without almost certainly breaking
> log-reading tools like pgfouine. Even changing the content of the line
> risks that, and for no visible gain.
>
> This seems like the worst form of bike-shedding to me. This log entry
> has been formatted this way since 7.4, and nobody has ever complained
> about it, until you suddenly decided it was a problem. Leave it be.

I propose to add '()' because it is confusing without it. I don't think
many people are using the feature or we would have received suggestions
for improvmement. As you can see, once I posted about it, there were a
number of people who wanted improvements.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +