Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
Cc: Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: moving pg_xlog -- yeah, it's worth it!
Date: 2010-02-11 11:29:20
Message-ID: 201002111129.o1BBTK518798@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> wrote:
>
> > Sorry if it is obvious.. but what filesystem/OS are you using and
> > do you have BBU-writeback on the main data catalog also?
>
> Sorry for not providing more context.
>
> ATHENA:/var/pgsql/data # uname -a
> Linux ATHENA 2.6.16.60-0.39.3-smp #1 SMP Mon May 11 11:46:34 UTC
> 2009 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> ATHENA:/var/pgsql/data # cat /etc/SuSE-release
> SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 10 (x86_64)
> VERSION = 10
> PATCHLEVEL = 2
>
> File system is xfs noatime,nobarrier for all data; OS is on ext3. I
> *think* the pg_xlog mirrored pair is hanging off the same
> BBU-writeback controller as the big RAID, but I'd have to track down
> the hardware tech to confirm, and he's out today. System has 16
> Xeon CPUs and 64 GB RAM.

I would be surprised if the RAID controller had a BBU-writeback cache.
I don't think having xlog share a BBU-writeback makes things slower, and
if it does, I would love for someone to explain why.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Matthew Wakeling 2010-02-11 12:39:18 Dell PERC H700/H800
Previous Message jesper 2010-02-11 10:05:17 Re: perf problem with huge table