Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: psql tab completion for DO blocks
Date: 2010-02-11 00:21:25
Message-ID: 201002110021.o1B0LPj03139@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Takahiro Itagaki wrote:
>
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Where are we on this patch? We should at least implement the completion
> > for 'LANGUAGE' in 'DO', and use the existing pg_language query for
> > completion. I am attaching a patch that does exactly this.
>
> I don't think we need the patch except adding DO to the top-level sql_commands.
>
> Syntax of DO command is:
> DO code [ LANGUAGE lang_name ]
> We need 'code' before LANGUAGE, but the patch completes "DO" to "DO LANGUAGE".
> It will be just a syntax error.
>
> Also, we've already had a completion after LANGUAGE (see words_after_create),
> so we don't need an additional Query_for_list_of_languages after LANGUAGE.

Ah, I see. I had not checked the patch against the actual syntax; shame
on me.

> BTW, I'm working on psql tab-completion adjustment for new syntax in 9.0.
> I'll send it soon.

OK, thanks.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2010-02-11 00:40:20 Re: log_error_verbosity function display
Previous Message Marko Tiikkaja 2010-02-11 00:13:19 Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations