From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: archive_timeout behavior for no activity |
Date: | 2010-02-05 23:18:51 |
Message-ID: | 201002052318.o15NIpV15408@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>
> > Looking at the archive_timeout documentation and
> > CheckArchiveTimeout(), it appears we force a new xlog file and
> > archive it even if no activity has been recorded in the xlog file.
> > Is this correct? Should we document this or fix it so only xlog
> > files with contents are archived?
>
> Er, you can probably blame me for that. Tom was going to fix it and
> I pointed out that it would break our monitoring of our warm standby
> processes. We have a one hour maximum and send alerts if we've gone
> 75 minutes or more without receiving a WAL file from one of our
> databases. Of course, if we had a nicer way to know that we were
> up-to-date with our WAL file copies, we wouldn't need this; but
> right now there aren't a lot of options for monitoring these things.
I am dismayed that we are using a 16MB file for monitoring archive
activity. Can't you use pg_current_xlog_location() and only check for
an archive file when that location changes?
Anyway, I have updated the documentation with the attached patch to
mention this issue, and added a C comment as well.
Is there a TODO here?
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
/rtmp/diff | text/x-diff | 2.4 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-05 23:19:56 | Re: archive_timeout behavior for no activity |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-02-05 22:52:25 | Re: WIP patch for system-catalog vacuuming via a relation map |