From: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Whitelisting? |
Date: | 2010-02-02 19:50:02 |
Message-ID: | 20100202195002.GF4020@alvh.no-ip.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-www |
Marc G. Fournier escribió:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
>
> >On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 8:39 AM, Alvaro Herrera
> ><alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> >>Selena Deckelmann escribi?:
> >>>Can we whitelist robert(at)pg-live(dot)info? He's got some large headers that
> >>>are tripping up majordomo, and I'm having to approve lotsa stuff.
> >>
> >>I think the right answer is to increase the header limit. I get some
> >>moderation requests from large headers on legitimate email too.
> >
> >I like that solution too!
> >
> >The high water mark was about 500. Here's an example error message:
> >
> >> A MIME header is too long (444 > 256)
>
> Does doubling to 512 sound okay? Or should I just go straight to
> 1024? thoughts?
1024 seems better. As Tom says, it's not that rare to see References
headers getting long on some threads.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2010-02-02 19:57:15 | Re: Whitelisting? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-02-02 19:42:15 | Re: Whitelisting? |