From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
Date: | 2010-01-30 00:31:18 |
Message-ID: | 201001300131.32733.andres@anarazel.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 29 January 2010 23:47:22 Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Andres Freund wrote:
> > On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> > > Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> > > >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> > > >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> > > >
> > > > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help,
> > > > at all.
> > >
> > > The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> > > all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items. This
> > > is a work item, and not a small one.
> >
> > What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in
> > 9.1?
>
> You mean turned on by default, right?
Obviously, yes ;-)
Andres
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Cédric Villemain | 2010-01-30 01:08:26 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2010-01-30 00:05:38 | Re: HS/SR and smart shutdown |