| From: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
| Date: | 2010-01-29 22:46:35 |
| Message-ID: | 201001292346.45234.andres@anarazel.de |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Friday 29 January 2010 23:34:09 Tom Lane wrote:
> Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
> >> I stand by the position that it's way too late in the cycle for
> >> insufficiently-thought-out proposals for major behavioral changes.
> >
> > I don't see how announcing this earlier in the dev cycle would help, at
> > all.
> The really short and sweet answer is that if you have any ambition at
> all to ship 9.0 this year, it is too late to add new work items. This
> is a work item, and not a small one.
What about anouncing in the 9.0 releasenotes that it will be removed in 9.1?
Andres
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-01-29 22:47:22 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-29 22:44:47 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |