| From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com |
| Cc: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
| Date: | 2010-01-29 21:01:37 |
| Message-ID: | 201001292101.o0TL1b002310@momjian.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> (4) The 8.3 issue wasn't nearly as bad as Tom is making it out to be.
> Yes, there was a lot of WTF going on, but only by people that aren't
> paying attention anyway and the work to fix it was pretty nominal.
The big mistake we made in 8.3 is not having those compatibility
functions that Peter created ready _at_ _release_ _time_. I believe
that was pure sloppiness on our part.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2010-01-29 21:03:03 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-01-29 20:58:55 | Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings |