| From: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Cc: | Michael Meskes <meskes(at)postgresql(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Hans-Juergen Schoenig <hs(at)cybertec(dot)at> |
| Subject: | Re: ECPG patch 4.1, out-of-scope cursor support in native mode |
| Date: | 2010-01-25 19:01:50 |
| Message-ID: | 20100125190150.GA9432@feivel.credativ.lan |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 07:52:05PM +0100, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote:
> But considering all the above, we might not need the new
> compat_informix/struct.pgc regression test. I think it was tested
> already in e.g. preproc/array_of_struct.pgc and preproc/type.pgc
> and the new feature (if accepted) is a unified one, it would show
> the problem for native mode as well.
That was my feeling too and the reason for these questions. Again, this has
nothing to do with the feature you implemented, it was just about this special
test.
Michael
--
Michael Meskes
Michael at Fam-Meskes dot De, Michael at Meskes dot (De|Com|Net|Org)
Michael at BorussiaFan dot De, Meskes at (Debian|Postgresql) dot Org
ICQ 179140304, AIM/Yahoo/Skype michaelmeskes, Jabber meskes(at)jabber(dot)org
VfL Borussia! Força Barça! Go SF 49ers! Use Debian GNU/Linux, PostgreSQL
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2010-01-25 19:06:54 | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2010-01-25 18:53:01 | Re: Clustering Docs WAS: Mammoth in Core? |