From: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: tab completion for prepared transactions? |
Date: | 2010-01-24 17:45:14 |
Message-ID: | 201001241745.o0OHjE604161@momjian.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> >> Right, I vaguely recall that the idea of tab-completion for those
> >> commands was rejected when 2PC was added because of that. A user sitting
> >> at a psql terminal is not supposed to prepare a transaction. That's
> >> application server's business.
> >
> > I think we should add a C comment documenting that fact.
>
> Hmm, I thought we explained that in the manual, but I can't see it. I
> think we should add a note to the ref page of PREPARE TRANSACTION,
> something like:
>
> "PREPARE TRANSACTION is not intended for use in applications or in
> interactive sessions. It's purpose is to allow an external transaction
> manager to perform atomic global transactions across multiple databases
> or other transactional resources. Unless you're writing a transaction
> manager, you probably shouldn't be using PREPARE TRANSACTION"
I was thinking of adding something in the psql C source code to explain
why certain commands are not implemented for tab completion.
--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Magnus Hagander | 2010-01-24 17:45:47 | Re: Resetting a single statistics counter |
Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-01-24 17:43:23 | Re: tab completion for prepared transactions? |