Re: damage control mode

From: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: damage control mode
Date: 2010-01-12 00:50:23
Message-ID: 201001120050.o0C0oNU06257@momjian.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus wrote:
> I'll also say: if we can't make time-based releases work, we're probably
> dead as a project. MySQL and Ingres both tried feature-based releases,
> and look where they are now.

That is a simplification. We have always done time-based releases with
adjustments for feature/stability. If we can't factor stability
concerns into the release timetable, we will end up like MySQL.

--
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> http://momjian.us
EnterpriseDB http://enterprisedb.com

+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua D. Drake 2010-01-12 00:52:51 Re: damage control mode
Previous Message Merlin Moncure 2010-01-12 00:44:18 Re: Compression Library and Usages