| From: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
|---|---|
| To: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: new full vacuum doesn't work |
| Date: | 2010-01-08 11:36:34 |
| Message-ID: | 20100108203634.9BDB.52131E4D@oss.ntt.co.jp |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am testing vacuum changes, and I found some strange behave:
Did you need "SET (fillfactor=100)" before vACUUM FULL?
=# select * from pgstattuple('pgbench_accounts');
-[ RECORD 1 ]------+-----------
table_len | 1365336064
tuple_count | 1000000
tuple_len | 121000000
tuple_percent | 8.86
dead_tuple_count | 0
dead_tuple_len | 0
dead_tuple_percent | 0
free_space | 1228669388
free_percent | 89.99
=# ALTER TABLE pgbench_accounts SET (fillfactor=100);
ALTER TABLE
=# vacuum full pgbench_accounts;
VACUUM
=# select * from pgstattuple('pgbench_accounts');
-[ RECORD 1 ]------+----------
table_len | 134299648
tuple_count | 1000000
tuple_len | 128000000
tuple_percent | 95.31
dead_tuple_count | 0
dead_tuple_len | 0
dead_tuple_percent | 0
free_space | 1840616
free_percent | 1.37
Regards,
---
Takahiro Itagaki
NTT Open Source Software Center
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-01-08 11:43:36 | Re: new full vacuum doesn't work |
| Previous Message | Filip Rembiałkowski | 2010-01-08 11:04:31 | Re: pg.dropped |